Citgo Asphalt Refining Company v. The Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical, and Energy Workers International Union Local No. 2-991
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
CITGO Asphalt Refining Company appeals the district court’s confirmation of a labor arbitrator’s decision that CITGO’s zero tolerance drug abuse policy is unreasonable. For the reasons that follow, we will reverse.
I. FACTS
CITGO Asphalt Refining Company (“CARCO”) is a New Jersey partnership involved in the oil refining industry. CITGO Petroleum Corporation (“CIT-GO”), is the majority partner of CARCO. In December 1998, CITGO announced that it was going to implement a new uniform national substance abuse policy, which included a zero tolerance policy (the “policy”), at all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Brentwood Medical Associates v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Teamsters Local 177 v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Hamilton Park Health Care Center Ltd. v. 1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers EastCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Nemsky v. ConocoPhillips Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Monongahela Valley Hospital v. United Steel Paper and ForestrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.