Legal Opinion

Robison v. Gull

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1918No. 3114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, the District Court of Millard County, Fifth District; Hon. D. H. Morris, Judge. Action by Almon Robison against William H. Gull and A, Ezra Gull, as administrator: Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an action to recover judgment on a promissory note and to foreclose a certificate of stock alleged to have been given as security. 'The action was originally commenced against William Gull and John Gull, makers of the note, but, it later being made to appear that John Gull died before the action was commenced, an administrator was appointed for *325his estate and substituted as a party by amendment to the complaint.

The complaint as amended was in the usual form of complaints in foreclosure proceedings, and, among other things, alleged in substance the execution and delivery of the note by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clawson v. WallaceUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McGregor v. PearsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Braswell v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Burns v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mower v. MowerUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Brown v. SkeenUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Salt Lake Inv. Co. v. StouttUtah Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API