Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 7, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Webster Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle.

Affirming in part and reversing'in part.

These two actions, in one of which the appellees, J. W. Franklin, and twelve others'are plaintiffs and in the other the appellees, J. -W, Stodghill, and ten others are plaintiffs, were brought in equity against the appellant, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, to compel the abatement, by a mandatory injunction, of an alleged nuisance created and maintained by the latter, the petition in each case alleging, in substance, that the appellees are the owners and in the actual possession of certain several tracts of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WhitsellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Roberts v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Central Consumers Co. v. PinkertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. Seifried v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  5. Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern R. R. v. WiarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Louisville Nashville Rr. v. Drainage CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API