Gammon v. Ganfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Bock county, Perkins, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after, verdict of: $122 for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
The action is to recover the remainder of the purchase price of a harvester and binder, sold by plaintiffs to defendant. The answer alleges that the .sale to defendant was by sample, and that by the terms of the sale the machine delivered or to be delivered was to be equal in quality and description to the machine shown to him, and that it was not equal to said machine, and that on discovering the fact he notified plaintiffs thereof, and returned to them the one delivered him. It also alleges that on ‘such sale the plaintiffs warranted the machine to be properly made and constructed, .and of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Healy v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Roblee v. SecrestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Potter v. EastonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Rees v. StormsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- W. W. Kimball Co. v. MasseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.