Legal Opinion

City of Elizabeth v. Force

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeal from a decree of the vice-chancellor, reported in Force v. City of Elizabeth, 1 Stew. 408.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chiee Justice.

This bill was filed by Mrs. Force to compel the city of Elizabeth to pay to her the money due on two of its negoti*588able bonds which she had purchased, and which bad been stolen from her. One of these bonds was of the denomination of $500, and the other of $1,000. With respect to the former of these instruments, I shall notice it no further than to say that, in my opinion, the questions connected with it were properly disposed of in the court of chancery. But the other bond stands upon quite different ground.

Such bonds or coupons, although stolen, are collectible in the hands…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mercer County v. HacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Spooner v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Newlin v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Vermilye & Co. v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Camden County Municipal Utility AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Joseph v. LesnevichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Abramowitz v. Washington Cemetery Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API