Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Camden County Municipal Utility Authority

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 8, 2003PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

ZAZZALI, J.

This 'appeal requires us to determine whether Section 41 of the Municipal and County Utilities Authority Law, N.J.S.A. 40:14B-1 to -70 (MCUAL), authorizes municipal and county utilities authorities to charge compound interest on delinquent customer accounts. We conclude that N.J.S.A. 40:14B-41 authorizes only simple interest. Because this appeal presents a matter of first impression and retroactive application could lead to substantial inequitable results, we also conclude that our decision applies prospectively.

I

Pursuant to the MCUAL,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Bergen Commercial Bank v. SislerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. North Bergen Rex Transport, Inc. v. Trailer Leasing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jean Levine, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United Healthcare Corporation (Dc Nj 01-Cv-04964)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Gregory Bohus v. Restaurant.Com IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. McKittrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Porreca v. City of MillvilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API