Legal Opinion

AFSCME Local 2505 v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 1, 1988No. ERB UC-68-86; CA A42519PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Petitioner is the exclusive collective bargaining representative for employes of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC), including liquor enforcement inspectors. After unsuccessful collective bargaining negotiations, petitioner filed a request with ERB to initiate binding interest arbitration, which is available when the bargaining unit includes employes who are prohibited from striking. ORS 243.742; AFSCME v. Executive Dept., 52 Or App 457, 628 P2d 1228, rev den 291 Or 771 (1981). Petitioner contends that the liquor enforcement inspectors are prohibited from striking, because they are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Federation of State v. Executive DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Eugene Education Ass'n v. Eugene School District 4JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. City of La Grande v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 924Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Redmond School District No. 2J v. Public Employe Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clackamas County v. Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation OfficersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API