Legal Opinion

Clackamas County v. Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1993No. UP-91-91; CA A75301Published

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Petitioner, the exclusive bargaining representative for parole and probation officers employed by Clackamas County, seeks review of the Employment Relations Board’s (ERB) order holding that the employees are not the equivalent of “police officers” within the meaning of ORS 243.736, that they are not prohibited from striking and, therefore, that petitioner committed an unfair labor practice “by insisting that the collective bargaining dispute between the parties be resolved through binding interest arbitration.” ORS 243.672(2)(b), (c).

Petitioner acknowledges that ERB’s result is consistent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. American Federation of State v. Executive DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. AFSCME Local 2505 v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API