Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 23, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-2623Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-2623 (TNM) THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul Bishop wants a job at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But the Department keeps rejecting him. So Bishop keeps suing the Department, pro se, claiming each time that unlawful discrimination motivated his non-selection. This is Bishop’s third such suit in the past four years. See Bishop v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., No. 1:19-cv-1836,

2020 WL 3064421

(D.D.C. June 9, 2020) (granting defendant’s motion for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API