Legal Opinion
United States v. London
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 26, 1976No. Crim. B-75-099PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLAIR, District Judge.
After having been convicted by a jury of conducting an illegal gambling business as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 1955 (1976 Supp.), Robert Reubin London a/k/a Fifi London, Julius Cottman, and Rufus Jones have moved for a judgment of acquittal or in the alternative for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. 1 Maceo Clerkly, who was found guilty by the court on the same charges after a trial on stipulated facts, has moved for a new trial. 2
Defendants present several grounds in support of their motions. Specifically, they contend…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Application of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Interception of Oral Communications, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.