Legal Opinion

In re Van Riper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1975 and maintained a law office in the City of Binghamton, Broome County, until this Court suspended him from practice, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), by order dated May 5, 2005 (Matter of Van Riper, 18 AD3d 954 [2005]).

Petitioner moves for an order imposing final discipline, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g), based on respondent’s conviction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York of one count of filing a false federal income tax return for 1998 in violation of 26 USC § 7206 (1), a federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re ChervinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KremnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re KremnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. MatterofKremnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API