Legal Opinion
In re Van Riper
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 2, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in 1975. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Binghamton, Broome County.
On October 2, 2001, this Court suspended respondent from practice, effective November 30, 2001, on account of his conviction for a serious crime until such time as a final disciplinary order is made (see, Matter of Van Riper, 287 AD2d 755). Re*573spondent was convicted, after pleading guilty in Binghamton City Court, of a violation of Penal Law § 175.30, a class A misdemeanor. He had caused a SCPA 2307-a acknowledgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re KuschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re PosnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Van RiperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of ChesebroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Matter of ChesebroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.