State v. Hayden, Unpublished Decision (8-5-2005)

OPINION

{¶ 1} In this case, Robert Hayden appeals from a trial court decision rejecting Hayden's application for DNA testing. As a single assignment of error, Hayden claims that "[t]he trial court abused its discretion when it failed to follow the procedures of 2953.74(A) rejecting Appellant's application for DNA testing." After reviewing the record and applicable law, we find the assignment of error without merit.

{¶ 2} In 1991, we affirmed Hayden's conviction on one count of rape, with a specification of a prior felony conviction. SeeState v. Hayden (Sept. 27, 1991), Montgomery App. No.…