Legal Opinion

State v. James Fogg

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 1, 2017No. 2016-0268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The defendant, James Fogg, appeals an order of the Superior Court ( McNamara , J.) denying his motion to dismiss one of the two counts of aggravated driving while intoxicated (DWI) of which he was convicted. See RSA 265-A:3 (2014). On appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court's interpretation of RSA 265-A:3 is incongruent with the statute's text and legislative history, and also violates his double jeopardy rights under the State and Federal Constitutions. We reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand.

I

The pertinent facts are as follows. On November 11, 2014, at approximately 3:40…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. State v. ThielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Jeffrey MaxfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  5. State of New Hampshire v. Shawn CarterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Jeffrey R. KeenanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  2. Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API