Anderson v. State Farm Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Linda Anderson appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of State Farm Insurance Co. We affirm.
The “regular use” exclusions at issue apply to passengers. See, e.g., Sears v. Grange Ins. Ass’n, 111 Wash.2d 636, 762 P.2d 1141, 1142-43 (1988), overruled on other grounds, Butzberger v. Foster, 151 Wash.2d 396, 89 P.3d 689 (2004). We think the state supreme court would not require control of the vehicle, as Anderson contends; rather, it would apply the Butzberger factors. 89 P.3d at 697. Under them, MA was “using” her mother’s car. This being so, there is no dispute that MA’s use…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Butzberger v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Sears v. Grange Insurance Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Barth v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999