Legal Opinion
Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 25, 2006No. 33398-8-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶[1 Claire Hall appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Inc., based on the conclusion that Hall’s underinsured motorist (UIM) and personal injury protection (PIP) insurance coverage did not cover injuries she sustained while driving her assigned school bus for the Puyallup School District (District). Holding that Hall’s use of the school bus constituted “regular use,” expressly excluded under her policy, we affirm.
Van Deren, J.
FACTS
¶2 Hall began working for the District as a substitute bus driver in 1995.1 In 1998, she became a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reliable Credit Ass'n v. Progressive Direct InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Amica Insurance Company v. ScherdnikDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Anderson v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Homesite Insurance Company v. FussellDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022