Legal Opinion

Royster & Haardt v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1944No. 3 Div. 414PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

This is a proceeding by statutory certiorari to review the judgment of the circuit court in a workman’s compensation case. The action was brought in the circuit court by the employer. •

The complaint conceded that the employee, Eddie R. Morgan, came to his death from accidental injury arising out of and in course of his employment; alleged that his employment had continued only a few weeks, and his average weekly earnings, ascertained as per Title 26, § 279(G) of the Code, were $24.32. These averments were admitted by answer, and the court decreed accordingly.

The complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Crosby v. Nunnally Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Crowder v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Ex Parte Todd Shipbuilding & Dry Docks Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Johnson v. Huxford Pole & Timber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Careline of Alabama, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API