Legal Opinion

(PC) Botello v. Hanlon

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 26, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00162Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VICTOR HUGO BOTELLO, No. 2:18-cv-162-TLN-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 S. HANLON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Hanlon moves for summary adjudication, arguing that he is immune 19 from suit on plaintiff’s state-law negligence claim.1 ECF No. 34. For the reasons that follow, the 20 motion for summary judgment should be granted. 21 I. Background 22 This action…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API