Legal Opinion

Pye v. Hoehn

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

In this motion returnable today, October 6, 1961, the defendants’ attorney seeks an order vacating and setting aside a subpcena served upon him and returnable Monday, October 9,1961, in trial part. The subpcena commands the defendants’ attorney to produce in court at the time of trial “your complete file on the matter of Franklyn Hoehn and William Hoehn v. David Pye and Graham Pye including but not limited to written statements (under oath or otherwise) made by Franklyn Hoehn and William Hoehn and testimony of any examinations before trial and any complaints and/or other legal papers executed…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of LuckenbachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API