Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Luckenbach

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 23, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

Motions by order to show cause to vacate a subpoena duces tecum served upon a former attorney for the executor, insofar as it requests the production of “ correspondence ” under item No. 1 on the ground that such correspondence by the attorney and the executor is privileged under section 353 of the Civil Practice Act.

The privilege of the client against disclosure by his attorney of confidential matters does not extend to everything which comes to the attorney’s knowledge while acting as attorney. For instance, statements made in the presence of a third party are not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloodgood v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. Tailored Woman, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pye v. HoehnNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zimmerman v. KallimopoulouCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API