Legal Opinion

Dygert v. Clem

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1914No. 4015PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Morgan District Court. Hon. >H. P. Burke, Judge

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

*287The lower court overruled a general demurrer to the complaint, and a motion to' dissolve the attachment, and, on defendants’ election to stand on the demurrer and' motion, entered judgment, sustaining the attachment and requiring that defendants, Dygert and Cockran, deliver up three certain promissory notes of $700 each, or, that plaintiffs recover from them $2,100 and interest. These two defendants bring error.

The court erred in sustaining the attachment. The first section of the attachment act (Sec. 91, Mills’ Ann. Code) specifically provides that an attachment may issue in “an action on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Supply Ditch Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Crane v. LarsenOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Francis v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  4. Goss v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  5. Mentzer v. EllisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Markle v. DearminSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API