People v. Kalikow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
On appeal from an order suppressing evidence seized from defendant along with statements that he made to the police, the People contend that the warrantless search of defendant was permissible. As the People correctly contend, the police may lawfully arrest a person for violating an ordinance and conduct a search incident to that arrest (see People v Canal, 24 AD3d 1034 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 846 [2006]; People v Taylor, 294 AD2d 825 [2002]; People v Pantusco, 107 AD2d 854, 855-856 [1985]). If there is no arrest, however, there can be no search incident thereto (see People v…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. ErwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. PantuscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. CanalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017