Legal Opinion

People v. Erwin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1977PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is reversed, the judgment vacated, the motion to suppress granted and the case remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment. The court, after a pretrial hearing, improperly denied defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence as the products of an illegal search and seizure. Although the officers had reasonable cause to stop defendant for driving through a red light, the subsequent search was not incident to a lawful arrest (cf. People v Copeland, 39 NY2d 986; People v Troiano, 35 NY2d 476). A search incident to arrest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. PerelNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. TroianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. CopelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. GruttolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. De SantisNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API