Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Carter

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1982No. 13040Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

In two areas I question the Court’s opinion: (1) the treatment of the instruction on self-defense, and (2) the analysis of the use of the “mug shot” of defendant.

I

As part of its instructions on self-defense, the trial court gave the following instruction:

*924“You are instructed that to justify a killing on the grounds of self-defense or of defense of one’s wife or one’s family it is necessary to establish that the person doing the killing was without fault in bringing on the difficulty, that is, that he was not the aggressor and did not promote the conflict.”

Although not objected to by defendant,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ivan v. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API