Legal Opinion

In re Archer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 10, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Judicial settlement of accounts of executors of Michael A. Archer, deceased.

1Opinion of the Court

Weiant, S.

The testator’s will was admitted to probate about the year 1881. Charles D. Archer and Allison M. Archer, the contestant, were appointed executors thereof, and authorized to then qualify. George A. Archer was naméd also as an executor, but not to qualify until he arrived at 21 years -of age. Charles and Allison qualified at once, and entered upon their duties. George qualified in about the year 1883, on his arrival at 21 years of age. In a proceeding commenced in January, 1888, Allison was enjoined from acting further as executor, and removed as such later in said year by a decree…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Seth v. CramerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  3. Van Epps v. Van EppsNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. Mitchell v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Crooke v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of DaltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Rothschild v. WeinthelIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Root v. LeysonMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of ArkenburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
  5. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API