Legal Opinion

Baker v. Coleman Abstract Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1922No. 6533PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The suit was brought in the justice court, and later tried in the county court on appeal. Appellee as plaintiff sued F. L. Wade, W. M. Hooper, and G. Wm. Baker, the appellant, as members of the firm of Mid-Continent Oil Lease Exchange, for a balance on account for abstracts furnished such firm. Defendants Wade and Hooper suffered judgment by default. Appellant defended on the ground that he had paid to ap-pellee the sum of 173.17 as his proportionate one-third of the account, with the understanding and agreement with appellee’s agent and general manager, E. P. Scarborough, that such sum was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Franklin Insurance v. VilleneuveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. StubbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Bergman Produce Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Graham v. KesselerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Rotan Grocery Co. v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Vogel v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Handy v. Olney Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Stallings v. Federal Underwriters ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Palmetto v. Lumber Co. v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API