Legal Opinion

Esser Distributing Co. v. Steidl

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 4, 1988No. 87-1214PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.

The plaintiffs appeal an order dismissing their securities fraud and common-law fraud claims against E.R. Thomas Steidl. They argue that the common-law fraud claims should be governed by the six-year statute of limitations for fraud rather than the three-year limit contained in sec. 551.59(5), Stats. Further, the plaintiffs claim that the three-year period for bringing securities fraud claims should not begin to run until discovery of the fraud.

We agree with the plaintiffs insofar as common-law fraud is a separate claim with separate remedies and a separate statute of limitations. Therefore,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Parrent v. Midwest Rug Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Koback v. CrookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kittilson v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gray v. LackeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Phillip F. Winskunas v. James G. Birnbaum and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Tomczak v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Esser Distributing Co. v. SteidlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Skrupky v. ElbertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API