Esser Distributing Co. v. Steidl
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.
The plaintiffs appeal an order dismissing their securities fraud and common-law fraud claims against E.R. Thomas Steidl. They argue that the common-law fraud claims should be governed by the six-year statute of limitations for fraud rather than the three-year limit contained in sec. 551.59(5), Stats. Further, the plaintiffs claim that the three-year period for bringing securities fraud claims should not begin to run until discovery of the fraud.
We agree with the plaintiffs insofar as common-law fraud is a separate claim with separate remedies and a separate statute of limitations. Therefore,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Parrent v. Midwest Rug Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Koback v. CrookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Kittilson v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gray v. LackeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Phillip F. Winskunas v. James G. Birnbaum and Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Tomczak v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Esser Distributing Co. v. SteidlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Skrupky v. ElbertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.