State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The one assignment of error brought forward and discussed in defendant’s brief is set out in the record as follows: “For that the trial Court committed prejudicial and reversible error in failing to charge the jury upon the lesser offenses of mansalughter [sic] in its varying degrees, self-defense or accident.”
According to G.S. 1-180 the trial judge is required to “declare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case.” *110The statute comprehends instructions by the trial judge “on all substantial features of the case arising on the evidence without special request…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AubertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980