Legal Opinion

Ocean National Bank of Kennebunk v. Diment

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

This appeal arises out of a contest over the ownership of 200 shares of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears) common stock. At the close of the evidence in a jury trial in Superior Court, York County, directed verdicts were entered for defendants Joseph Gordon Diment and Mary Diment on both the plaintiff’s complaint and the defendants’ counterclaim. We deny the appeal.

I

In 1971, to assist their son in obtaining a bank loan from the Colonial Trust Company (Colonial), the Diments signed a Hypothecation Agreement authorizing the son to pledge 200 shares of their Sears stock as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Auburn v. MandarelliSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. O'Connell v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Varney v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. AnaconeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  5. Boetsch v. Rockland JayceesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Cox v. Billy Pounds Motors, Inc. (In Re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  4. Bradford v. DumondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Northeast Bank of Lewiston & Auburn v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API