Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 20, 1972No. 680-3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.

This matter comes before the court after issuance of an order to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue. We deny the writ and remand the *677matter to the superior court for correction of procedural defects.

On July 6, 1972, relator, Elizabeth Holland, was convicted, in a district court trial, of driving while under the influence of liquor. The court imposed a $250 fine and sentenced the relator to 5 days in jail, suspending $150 and 4 days, plus costs. Pursuant to RCW 10.10.010, an appeal bond in the amount of $100 was set. On July 7, 1972, relator filed a notice of appeal and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In Re BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lambert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Birch Bay Trailer Sales, Inc. v. Whatcom CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API