Arnett v. Commonwealth

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

Arthur Arnett appeals from a judgment convicting him of- the crime of assault with intent to rob, and fixing his punishment at two years’ imprisonment.

On January 14, 1936, the grand jury of Magoffin county indicted appellant Arnett and Kelly Howard for the crime of grand larceny; the indictment charging that the defendants did unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously take, steal, and carry away and out of the possession of Harris Handshoe, two hound dogs of the value-of $25, etc. On January 23,1936, Arnett was tried by a. jury and found “not guilty.”

On…