Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Karpinski, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant, Paragon Data Systems, Inc. (“the hardware company”), appeals the trial court’s ruling on a declaratory judgment action interpreting its contract with plaintiff, Automated Solutions Corp. (“the software company”). Paragon manufactures computer hardware, and Automated writes software to run on computer hardware. 1
{¶ 2} The hardware company discussed with the Chicago Tribune a project that would provide the Tribune with a hand-held computerized inventory device for its newspapers. Because the hardware company provided only the physical components, it needed a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- White Co. v. Canton Transportation Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Michael J. Topolos v. Jeffrey Caldewey, an Individual Dba Vintage Image, Robert Titus, Richard Paul Hinkle, an Individual and Does I Through MCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- City of St. Marys v. Auglaize County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Atelier District v. Parking Co. of America, 07ap-87 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- 3637 Green Rd. Co., Ltd. v. Specialized Component Sales Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- CosmetiCredit, L.L.C. v. World Fin. Network Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.