Lingo v. Swicord
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Randolph Chancery Court; L. F. Reeder, Chancellor; There was no proper service upon Osburn and Lingo. 144 Ark. 473. Swicord was a joint maker and liable for the entire amount. 80 Ark. 285. Plaintiffs were not co-sureties nor entitled to contributions from each other, but were liable to each other in the absence of a special agreement. 94 Ark. 333.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
Appellee instituted this action in the chancery court of Randolph County against one Dillport and the appellants, Tom Lingo and D. H. Osburn, and appellants were served with process in Lawrence County, where they reside. A decree by default was rendered in favor of appellee and against all of the defendants, and the two appellants subsequently prosecuted an appeal. Dillport has not appealed. It appears from the record that the decree was rendered by the court upon the complaint and exhibits.
It is alleged in the complaint that on September 5, 1919, Dillport executed and delivered to appellant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. HallumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Hoyt v. RossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Hazel v. SharumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Gibson v. TalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Metzger v. MannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Barr v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.