People v. Hanford
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
Defendant was charged by an information filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco with the crime of violating the provisions of section 21 of the juvenile court law. She was tried, convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail of said city and county. Defendant has appealed from the judgment and the order denying her motion for a new trial.
The evidence is sufficient to establish the crime charged. It shows that the defendant knowingly permitted the prosecuting witness to commit acts of prostitution in the defendant’s house and encouraged the commission…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. De MartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WeinbrenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- People v. WilhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947