Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Hemmings
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 29, 1964No. 32967PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
170 So.2d 33 (1964)
Hugh Miller MERCER et al., individually and as partners doing business under the firm name of Price Waterhouse & Co., and Jim Walter Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellants,
v.
Arthur I. HEMMINGS et al., as members of and constituting the Florida Board of Accountancy, Appellees.
No. 32967.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 29, 1964.
Rehearing Denied January 11, 1965.
Cromwell A. Anderson, Louis S. Bonsteel, and Smathers & Thompson, Miami, for appellants.
Chester Bedell, Jacksonville, for appellees.
ROBERTS, Justice.
This case is before us on direct appeal from a final decree…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goesaert v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- California v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Robertson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Robertson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Meyers v. MatthewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Junco v. State Bd. of AccountancySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Mercer v. HemmingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Bevis v. EastlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Hall v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- State, Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Accountancy v. RampellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.