Zeigler v. Beers
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND MEMORANDUM
[Resolving Doc. Nos. 4, 5, 11]
GWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions to remand from the State of Ohio and the Barberton Rescue Mission, Inc. (“Mission”). [Doc Nos. 4, 5]. The United States opposed the motions to remand., [Doc.,No. 7]. The Mission filed a motion for stay until determination of the issue of remand. [Doc. 11], For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motions to remane! and remands this case to the Court of-Common Pleas, Stark County, Ohio. The Court accordingly DISMISSES the Mission’s motion to stay as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- West v. Aurora CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Coyne v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Slatery v. Tenn. Valley Auth.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Burns v. Prudential Securities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- McEachern v. McEachernDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
- Tiburon Land and Cattle, LP v. StephensDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025