Legal Opinion

Cellex Biosciences, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 1995No. C3-95-739Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, the insured under a policy issued by respondent insurer, challenges the district court’s award of summary judgment to respondent on claims that respondent had no contractual obligation to reimburse appellant for pre-tender defense costs incurred by appellant in defending a lawsuit brought by a third party. Because we conclude that under the terms of the policy respondent is not obligated to reimburse appellant for pre-ten-der defense costs, we affirm.

FACTS

On June 18, 1993, Cellex Biosciences, Inc. (CBI) received a letter from Celox Corporation (Celox)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Seifert v. Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API