Cellex Biosciences, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant, the insured under a policy issued by respondent insurer, challenges the district court’s award of summary judgment to respondent on claims that respondent had no contractual obligation to reimburse appellant for pre-tender defense costs incurred by appellant in defending a lawsuit brought by a third party. Because we conclude that under the terms of the policy respondent is not obligated to reimburse appellant for pre-ten-der defense costs, we affirm.
FACTS
On June 18, 1993, Cellex Biosciences, Inc. (CBI) received a letter from Celox Corporation (Celox)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Seifert v. Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.