Legal Opinion
Crespo v. Kreisel Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
Before me is an application by defendant 160 West End Avenue Owners Corp. to renew and reargue its motion to dismiss *416this action which I had denied by decision dated April 10, 1997 (172 Misc 2d 182). In that decision I ruled that the operation of the cooperative apartment building owned by movant does not "affect” interstate commerce. Accordingly, I held that the instant claim, relating to the firing of the plaintiff superintendent (allegedly because of his age), is not subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (9 USC § 1 et seq.; FAA), and that,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maryland Casualty Company v. Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Gus Bevona, President, Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Fletcher v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wertheim & Co. v. HalpertNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Jackson v. Quanex Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crespo v. 160 West End Avenue Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999