Legal Opinion
Matheny v. Bell
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2020No. 3:20-cv-02065Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CATHERINE MATHENY and TAMI PULOS, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-2065 : (JUDGE MARIANI) Plaintiffs, : v. . LAWRENCE BELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs have each filed an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs in the above-captioned matter. (Docs. 2, 3). In Count One of their Complaint, filed by privately retained counsel on November 9, 2020, Plaintiffs assert claims for violation of the Fair Housing Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 3604(a) and (b), and 3617. (Doc. 1 ff] 59, 60,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Walker v. People Express Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Sinwell, William v. Governor Milton Shapp, Governor of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.