Legal Opinion

Hergenrother v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1939No. 27,051PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of robbery while armed, upon an amended affidavit. The error assigned is the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The first proposition relied upon, questions the correctness of instruction No. 15, given by the court of its own motion. This instruction stated that:

“Evidence has been given in this cause to the effect that the defendant was present at the scene of other robberies a short time before and a short time after the commission of the alleged robbery on which the defendant is being tried. .'. .”

The instruction further stated that the evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Whiteman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Zimmerman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Meeks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Loveless v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API