Brooks Berg v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
Statement of the Case
[1] Brooks Berg appeals his convictions for operating while intoxicated, as a Class D felony, and reckless driving, as a Class B misdemeanor. 1 Berg raises a single issue for our review, namely, whether the State violated his double, jeopardy rights under Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 82 (Ind.1999), when it used the evidence if had presented to the jury to support the reckless-driving charge to demonstrate the endangerment element of the operating-while-intoxicated charge. The State concedes on appeal that this use of the evidence resulted in a violation of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Spivey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Guyton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Juan M. Garrett v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kevin Henson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Jordan B. Wadle v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Lola M. Sells v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Akheem J. Purnell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Albert Webb v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.