Commonwealth v. McPeak
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPopovich, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority since I am convinced that the Philadelphia Police Officers were not authorized to arrest appellant in Cheltenham Township pursuant to the Statewide Municipal Police Jurisdiction Act (MPJA).1 Accordingly, I would find that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized as a result of the officers’ unauthorized actions.
The issue on appeal is whether the officers had the authority to arrest appellant in Chel-tenham Township. It is clear that Chelten-ham Township was outside the officers’ primary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MagwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. StasiakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. DontonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. FischerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.