Legal Opinion
Blechner v. Daimler-Benz AG
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 24, 2006No. CIV.A. 04-331-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion Of Defendants DaimlerChrysler AG And Daimler-Benz AG To Dismiss The Complaint (D.I.51). For the reasons discussed, the Motion will be granted.
I. Factual Background
The following facts are alleged in Plaintiffs’ Complaint. In November 1998, Chrysler and Daimler-Benz merged to form DaimlerChrysler, a German corporation. (D.I. 1 at 2). Defendants, in order to secure shareholder approval, identified this merger as a “merger-of-equals,” rather than as an acquisition. Id. As a part of the merger-of-equals, shareholders were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Royal Dutch/Shell Transport Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007