In re the Personal Restraint of Theders

*425¶1

Grosse, J.

— A criminal defendant does not have a right under the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment to prevent the introduction of incriminating statements of a codefendant unless those statements are offered for the truth of the matter asserted. When they are offered for reasons other than proving the truth of the matter, as here, they are not hearsay and are not contrary to Crawford v. Washington,1 Moreover, the Personal Restraint Petition (PRP) is a collateral attack on a trial that occurred in 2001 and on a direct appeal filed in early 2003, long before Crawford was decided and…