Legal Opinion
In Re Theders
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 21, 2005No. 53557-9-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
123 P.3d 489 (2005)
130 Wash.App. 422
In re the Personal Restraint Of William H. THEDERS, Jr., Petitioner.
No. 53557-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
November 21, 2005.
Tom Conom, Attorney at Law, Edmonds, WA, for Appellant.
Lee Davis Yates, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
GROSSE, J.
¶ 1 A criminal defendant does not have a right under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to prevent the introduction of incriminating statements of a co-defendant unless those statements are offered for the truth of the matter asserted. When they are offered for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State of Washington v. Bryan Jack Ross CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State of Washington v. Michael Levi BackemeyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018