Legal Opinion

Hughley v. Saunders

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2009No. 2009-1228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, Kevin Hughley, for a writ of habeas corpus. Hughley had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise any error by the trial court in calculating his jail-time credit. State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton, 119 Ohio St.3d 350, 2008-Ohio-4476, 894 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 3. Moreover, because he attacks only one of his sentences, he is not entitled to the writ. “ ‘Where a petitioner is incarcerated for several crimes, the fact that the sentencing court may have lacked jurisdiction to sentence him on one of the crimes does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keith v. BobbyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Swiger v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Rudolph v. HortonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Crutchfield (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. McCormickOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Brack v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Powell v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Thomas v. TibbalsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API