Legal Opinion

In re Ellis

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 26, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, all the claims in appellant’s application.1

The Invention

The claimed invention relates to floor gratings, and can be sufficiently understood from a reading of claim 1 with reference to appellant’s Figure 3:

1. A floor grating, comprising: a plurality of main support members [12], a plurality of secondary support bars [16] supported by said members and extending in fixed parallel spaced relation therebetween,

a plurality of closely spaced wire rod members [18]…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Robert v. AntleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Application of Raymond J. HeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Carl D. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Stevenson v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. In Re Richard M. DeminskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Digitronics Corp., Now Amperex Electronic Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. The New York Racing Association, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. In re Mlot-FijalkowskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API