In re Ellis
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, all the claims in appellant’s application.1
The Invention
The claimed invention relates to floor gratings, and can be sufficiently understood from a reading of claim 1 with reference to appellant’s Figure 3:
1. A floor grating, comprising: a plurality of main support members [12], a plurality of secondary support bars [16] supported by said members and extending in fixed parallel spaced relation therebetween,
a plurality of closely spaced wire rod members [18]…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Robert v. AntleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Raymond J. HeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Carl D. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Stevenson v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In Re Richard M. DeminskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Digitronics Corp., Now Amperex Electronic Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. The New York Racing Association, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- In re Mlot-FijalkowskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.