Application of Raymond J. Heldt
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Heldt appeals from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, which affirmed the rejection of both claims in his application 1 as obvious over the prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The Invention
The invention before the court consists of an elongated, hollow tube, designed to be placed within a golf bag, in number corresponding to the number of golf clubs to be carried in the bag, so as to receive the grip and shaft portions of each club and thereby segregate the clubs from each other. Such storage tubes, it is said, not only facilitate…
2Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stevenson v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- In Re John R. FritchCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- In re FielderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In Re Wayne O. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.