Legal Opinion

Klajic v. Castaic Lake Water Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 2004No. B161069, B163110PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.—

INTRODUCTION

We are asked by the Castaic Lake Water Agency (the Agency) to construe section 15.1 of its enabling act, effective January 2002. (Stats. 2001, ch. 929, § 3, 72A West’s Ann. Wat.—Appen. (2004 Supp.) § 103—1 et seq., p. 487 et seq., hereinafter the Agency Enabling Act.) The Agency has appealed from the judgment of the trial court ordering the issuance of a writ of mandate that prohibits the Agency from selling drinking water directly to consumers. The court ruled that section 15.1 of the Agency Enabling Act is not an independent grant of authority, and to sell…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. KLAJIC v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. MacEdo v. BosioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. TillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. FuentesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Citizens for Ceres v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. AbercrombieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API