Legal Opinion

State Real Estate Commission v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1970No. Appeal, 32PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellant is a licensed real estate broker, having been so licensed since 1936. The facts in this case are as follows:

An investigator employed on behalf of the State Real Estate Commission was given an assignment to make a routine inspection of the appellant’s real estate office with instructions to “pay special attention to the escrow account.” Pursuant to this assignment, the investigator made four attempts to inspect the appellant’s *162office records but was not able to do so because appellant was absent on each occasion.

During these visits the investigator…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Annenberg v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Lanchester v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Andresen v. BAR ASS'N OF MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Estate of BaehrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. Altemose Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API